Last week I attended a Housing and Homelessness workshop, organised as a day of 'Continuing Ministerial Development' for clergy in the Oxford Diocese, which works not only in Oxford but across the whole of the Thames Valley.    An area where housing and homelessness seem to have increasingly become very visible social problems of the challenges faced by many of those living in our communities.

When one of those assembled introduced himself as Neo, a homeless man, I immediately felt this was going to be a training day like no other.  It seemed we suddenly had an incredible opportunity to leave our fears at the door and to talk honestly about how we and the current systems seem ineffective in helping those who find themselves sleeping on the pavement.

We started the morning by exploring what having somewhere to call home actually means and in it's simplest form everyone seemed to agree it was a place of 'shelter, safety and hope', yet perhaps too it was also somewhere to keep any possessions that reminded you of who you are - providing you with an identify'.

For my part having prepared a presentation on the findings of Oxfordshire Uncovered, which highlighted almost 50% of the population earn an annual income less than the amount needed to afford the average market rent which had led me to review  the recent white paper, 'Fixing our Broken Housing Market'. One of those many lightbulb moments but there in the title was the real problem.

Somehow through the passing years we appear to have boiled down our most basic human need for shelter to a market that needs fixing.

In its opening pages, the white paper highlights many economic arguments to illustrate why the Housing Market needs fixing:

  • Low levels of house building means less work for those involved in construction (architects, decorators, brick manufacturers) reducing receipts from employment income tax and corporation tax

  • Lack of housing supply results in high demand for limited stock creating high rents, means those in private rentals will struggle to pay and the taxpayer has to pay out more in Housing Benefit

  • The higher the % of income spent on housing means less money gets spent in the wider economy

  • Housing is one of the few investments that can be bought with debt, making it easy for some to ‘get a foot on property ladder’ but this. creating an ever widening gap in the property haves and the property have nots

Yet, whilst these are of course, all true, for me they miss the very essence of why housing matters and how this is affecting the lives and well-being of so many in our communities.

In particular, wherever there is an acute shortage of housing this creates opportunities for exploitation and abuse e.g. a non-ethical letting of dangerous, overcrowded properties. Indeed, the loss of a private sector tenancy is now the most common cause of homelessness - depriving many of safe, secure shelter.”

This is a really important issue and one I would urge everyone to consider during the election campaign period that we now find ourselves in 'what do the various manifestos say about plans for providing  affordable housing?'